Message in a Bottle

The jolting news last Friday that Fuller’s brewery in Chiswick, U.K. (not the pubs and hotels) was sold to Asahi, the large Japanese brewery, is still reverberating through the international beer community.

Asahi has expanded impressively in recent years through strategic acquisition. It holds Dutch Grolsch, Czech Pilsner Urquell, Italian Peroni, Hungarian Dreher, and now the historic Fuller brands among other international names. (Fuller’s pubs and hotels will retain full rights to various trade names of Griffin Brewery at Chiswick in a unique, dual-usage arrangement, but outside the pubs and hotels the brands have been sold).

During my recent extended sojourn in Florida I saw first-hand how Asahi is actively promoting premium brands in its stable, Peroni in this case. The image below is an example, at an Italian restaurant outside Delray Beach. The beer in the glass is not Peroni, but you see the counter “talker” or tent, and there were other, more prominent point of sale notices for Peroni in the eatery.

To my best recollection, there was also a related promotion to pair Peroni with different Italian dishes.

Similar treatment will follow for Fuller’s brands, the official Fuller announcement (see its website) said as much. This is good as far as it goes, but I have less confidence that the real ale traditions at Griffin Brewery in Chiswick will continue as before.

First, given the apparent value of the land purchased with the brewery, pressure to sell it for development seems inevitable and with that a move, in time, to another location. Perhaps to Meantime, an Asahi craft beer unit further to the east in London, or elsewhere.

It may be a matter of time too before the marquee ales will be filtered and served under top pressure, 5 lbs PSI or more to reduce premature oxidation. Such beers can still be pulled through a handpump, giving them a cask ale mien. It may start with non-tied houses and other pubs outside the Fuller pub and hotel network and migrate finally to the Fuller pubs and bars.

This is speculation: maybe none of this will happen, but it is speculation I would not have made before the deal. I have other reasons to think off-shore ownership – any country’s, not just Japan’s – is less than favourable to the cask tradition at the heart of Griffin Brewery.

The increasing market share of craft beer in Britain, most of which is chilled and fizzy, will increase pressure in that direction, quite literally.

Why didn’t part of the family sever links with the pubs and hotels and buy the brewery? Why didn’t another British business, venture capital or a new flotation say (so not a major ale competitor) buy the brewery? We can’t know the answers, and the families must have canvassed the alternatives.

What the saga shows so far – of this we can be certain if nothing else – is that the romance breweries create through advertising and promotion, to a willing audience to be sure, has limits. Yes, brewing can be handed down through the generations. Yes, the descendants care about tradition. Yes, they probably believe it when they say, sometimes in a product ad, they will never “sell up”, in the clipped British phrase. (Somehow, “sell up” has a jaunty ring. Contrast with the blunt American “sell out”).

But at the end of the day, or century, or what have you, business has an iron logic. The occasional, rude manifestation comes as a shock for many.

Of course, nothing is ever 100% predictable. Maybe someone in the families controlling Fuller, with an uncommon love for traditional brewing, might have made the difference. One thinks of the late George G. Bateman’s inspiring struggle years before to keep his regional brewery alive and independent. Read in his own words how he did it, from the brewery’s website.

Sometimes, it works out, from the beer enthusiast’s point of view, that is. More often, it doesn’t.

 

 

Ontario Brown Ale

Fade to Brown

Ontario brown ale is a species of what the BJCP calls British Brown Ale. The term “species” is justified I think. Brown ale continues to be brewed in the province since inception of modern craft brewing and various examples show a family resemblance.

I haven’t encountered a group of craft browns elsewhere with quite the same characteristics. It’s an Ontario thing, it seems.

The beer shown, Barley Days Wind and Sail from Picton, ON in Prince Edward County, exemplifies the type: lightly malty with cocoa and chocolate tones. It has good but not pronounced hopping, of the neutral, old world type. (No “citrus”, that term beloved of 10,000 beer labels).

Ontario brown ale achieves the profile simply with a blend of barley malts: no chocolate or coffee added, a good thing for our taste.

Other examples are Amsterdam Downtown Brown, Upper Canada Dark Ale, Wellington County Ale, Black Oak Nut Brown Ale,  and Waterloo Dark*. They are about 5% ABV, good for drinking a couple, good with food. Each has its merits, with a different accent on the cocoa or chocolate, acidity level, hopping, etc.

The beers by current standards are not greatly impactful but in truth offer excellent drinking. There is a time and place for each style, or each taste. Put another way, this one is a lover not a fighter. Tall dark and handsome.

It helps to drink them at not much cooler than room temp, and not too gassy – easy to adjust with a debonair stir of the swizzle.

These beers are like keg mild in Britain but stronger, or like Samuel Smith’s Nut Brown Ale, Double Maxim Brown Ale, and Mann’s Brown Ale, influencers in the early days of craft. Regretfully I must exclude Newcastle Brown Ale since recent tastings disclose little flavour, imo.

BJCP, a judging certification group, takes pains to explain that British Brown Ale is not a historical type or intended, when grouped with porters and mild ales, to suggest any common origins. I get that, but the beers can in practice resemble each other, and the grouping makes sense.

Barley Days’ brown could be taken for a light porter, in fact. Conversely, some beers labelled porter or stout in Canada are similar to Ontario brown, Moosehead’s new Export Stout, say, or Mad and Noisy Coconut Porter from Creemore.

Barley Days has pleased (me) more than disappointed lately. As I reported earlier its buck a beer entrant to our Premier’s plea for cheaper beer, Loon Lager, is an excellent light Munich blonde, or Helles. The LCBO listings have it now at $1.65 a can so I guess the special has ended, but I’ll still buy it.

A canned Loyalist Lager and Harvest Gold Pale Ale pleased much less, not enough taste. I won’t repeat.

But if I can find one or two beers in any brewery’s range I like, I’m laughin’. Starting with Wind and Sail from Barley Days.**

…………….

*Described as a lager on the website of Waterloo Brewing but partakes of the general character I’ve described for Ontario brown ale, imo. Other Ontario dark lagers are more frankly in the classic Munich Dunkel mode.

**Picton is a charming resort town some two hours drive east of Toronto, on Lake Ontario. There are many notable features there redolent of its geography or history, from countless sunken wrecks off the shore, to the famous sand dunes just outside of town, to the RAF presence in WW II to teach flying and gunnery. It’s well-known for a growing winery scene, more than breweries in fact, but many farms continue in operation and supply both activities. Picton was settled by United Empire Loyalists, Americans who elected to stay with the Crown during the American Revolution. They came starting in the 1780s. Canadians have justly evolved a distinct character but Americans formed the corpus of settlement in Ontario. This has had an obvious influence on our life and mores. There is much more that unites us than separates, in that while settlement was superintended by the British, enduring social and cultural norms arrived with people who had lived in America for 100 years or more before decamping to Upper Canada. More information on Picton here.

 

 

 

 

Bass Ale in Toronto: Coda

One of the great ironies of the rise of I.P.A. (India Pale Ale) in U.S. craft and international brewing is an inverse decline of Bass Ale, originally Bass India Pale Ale. I refer here to Bass in North America and probably the U.K. It does enjoy strong sales in a few select markets, notably Japan, but where craft culture is strong the brand has languished.

Bass was de-anchored from its heritage when the Belga-Brazil international brewer Anheuser-Busch InBev acquired the business in Burton-on-Trent, U.K. about 20 years ago. In a series of corporate manoeuvres related to anti-trust compliance, AB In Bev contracted the brand out to North American-based Molson-Coors, which now owns the historic Burton brewery. Other brewers have made Bass too for the label-owner.

Marston’s, a surviving old Burton firm, currently makes the draught (real ale). Bottled and probably kegged beer (non-real ale) are made elsewhere in Britain for shipment overseas except to the U.S. and Belgium where AB InBev makes Bass locally, and latterly Canada.

By latterly, I mean that until quite recently small quantities of draft-only Bass Ale were produced at AB InBev/Labatt Brewery in Toronto. The city’s Elephant and Castle pub chain was one outlet for it, perhaps the only one. But on my last visit to a E & C – no Bass, and it was off the menu.

The website of Ontario’s The Beer Store, in good part owned by AB InBev, listed it for some years in kegs, but no longer. It therefore appears it is no longer available.

The beer, shown above last year at a E&C downtown, was very nice. It was similar to the imported Bass we used to get but fresher and better, even though only 4% ABV for some reason. It probably simply followed the current U.K. practice in this regard. The standard Canadian strength is 5% ABV.

Bass was at that level as an import, and even higher historically. Craft IPA is usually around 7% ABV, but Bass has stayed behind, like a once-thoroughbred racer whose pace is now a trot.

Few know or care today that this very Bass is a cornerstone of modern IPA. There would be no IPA today but for Bass and other early avatars: Hodgson, Salt, Allsopp, all popular in India in the early 1800s.

Bass until the craft era was well-reputed. It has a characteristic nutty, fruity taste. Apple-like, I always thought.

Many of the Burton beers were well-known for a tang of sulphur. I discussed it here a while back, and showed from original research that American beer mavens once savoured a “Bass Stink”. This was likely related either to the gypsum content of Burton well waters, a secondary fermentation from wild yeast, or both.

Latter-day Bass in bottles and cans, as well as kegged Bass such as the Canadian one mentioned, eschew the effect, an acquired taste for many. The draught Bass brewed at Marston’s still has it, a good thing for traditionalists.

I prefer the cleaner, brewery-conditioned Bass. But it seems the Toronto supply is used up. Will it come back? We’ll see. But there is little point to offering such an old specialty if you don’t tell people – accurately – what it is and what it means. I hope AB InBev will put the accent on educating the Ontario consumer, if the beer re-appears in the future.

If modern craft brewing is a party and Bass is crying, who can blame her? It’s her party, she can cry if she wants to. At least, she was on the committee.

 

 

Fuller’s Brewery – Meet the new boss

I will keep this short as I’m writing from the road. The sale of Fuller’s brewery in Chiswick, West London arouses deep emotion in the heart of all true beer lovers of any generation or (today) nationality.

With roots in the 1800s and links to yet more distant brewing onsite, Fuller was the last family-controlled firm in London of the pre-craft/pre-CAMRA generation of English brewers. Moreover they were specialists in cask ales, a category under pressure again in Britain – quite literally as it happens.

Times and the business climate change, we all know it. And brewing will continue onsite at least for the forseeable future, but in the hands of a Japanese lager business with unceasing international ambitions whose perspective will inevitably differ from the descendants of the British founders who have sold their controlling shares.

I will always recall best Fuller’s of 30 years ago. The houses (pubs) seemed more natural then, less professional, more in keeping with their origins as independantly founded, hence more diverse in character and interesting.

The beer was better too, especially the famous Extra Special Bitter. Its hop taste seemed to change in recent decades, and the beer is less winy and sweet now, IMO.

Still, the porter is good as are some of the vintage and one off brews. And London Pride bitter, for its part, still deserves the name when well-served.

All things must pass, as another British legend, Beatle George Harrison, once set in song.

As the London-born Pete Townshend wrote too, the song is over, or in a manner of speaking it is.

It’s not all behind me though, the music lives on, in the form of a contemporary brewing tradition of symphonic complexity that is audible through the world.

To a not inconsiderable degree, the inspiration for that can be traced to the vatted lyres of Chiswick.

 

The NYT Gets the Story and then Some

In my last post, I showed that Watney’s Red Barrel enjoyed a quality image in the American market from approximately 1964-1994. I dealt with critical and consumer reaction, not sales, to be sure. Heineken and other import market leaders – Becks, Molson for a long time, later Corona  – never had any worries Red Barrel would challenge their hegemony, but it did enjoy a good reputation.

In Britain, as the 1970s wore on Watney’s Red, successor to Red Barrel in the U.K., increasingly attracted the ire of the advised beer drinker. Quickly-growing CAMRA, the beer lobby founded in 1971 whose raison d’être is traditional (cask) ale, had Red in its sights. Watney’s did introduce or expand availability of cask ale, but its defence of Red was destined for failure.

Did Americans continue to view Red Barrel with blithe equanimity? For the most part, yes. Only a handful of people here knew the story of the maladroit Red Revolution ad campaign. A few homebrewers knew, as well as the few beer writers who had spent time in Britain such as Stephen Morris, author of the The Great Beer Trek, published in 1984.

Michael Jackson, the influential British beer writer was travelling extensively in North America from the late 70s so he would have discussed the issue with the new generation of American beer journalists and emerging craft brewers. Of course, too, his 1978 The World Guide to Beer chronicled the story graphically, so those who bought the book, who read that part of it, or that part of it carefully, knew as well.

But in relative terms most buyers of imported beer had no clue, even after 1978 but certainly before. To them, Red Barrel was just another interesting-looking bottle or draft tap with a big price tag.

An exception to the general pattern is a 1975 New York Times story that explained CAMRA’s origins and exactly what was happening with Watney’s Red. The focus was Britain but it was noted Watney’s was making a push to sell more Red Barrel in the U.S. The story at the time had few or no ripples in the American beer market. If Watney’s Red Barrel did not become what Corona did, it was nothing to do with the Red debacle in Britain.

The beer simply did not appeal to enough people. Being an ale told against it too, as the big imports were all lagers or ales similar to lager such as Molson Export or Molson Golden Ale.

But the New York Times was on to something, and taking a man-in-the-street approach questioned patrons in an English pub about beer preferences. It chose the Elephant & Castle in St. Albans, the small city serving as a bedroom suburb (or it would increasingly) for London. Not coincidentally St. Albans was, and is, host to CAMRA’s headquarters.

Famously the Times is read by a relatively small part of the reading public, the chattering class, based in the northeast, well-off in comparison to the rest of the country, liberal, and upscale in habits and attitudes. Readers of the article who drank alcohol for the most part had no interest in beer – no serious interest I mean. It hasn’t changed that much, beer coverage in the Times seems to oscillate between the pro forma and the non-existent, and surely this reflects the interests and habits of the audience it serves (the bulk of it).

Times readers drink wine or spirits, with a focus on the foreign at least until the American wine and Kentucky bourbon booms became fashionable. At least that is my take having read the paper for decades.

But the Times did get the CAMRA and Watney’s story right, and fairly early too. The writer did not perceive the implications for a potential beer revolution in the States, but given the year in question, when the first true craft brewery, New Albion Brewing in California, was still a year from opening, that is certainly understandable.

As to Watney, it  wasn’t going down without a fight. The journalist reported:

The Watney’s people do not enjoy [the] … criticism, in part because they are making a strong effort to tap the lucrative American market by selling Watney’s “Red Barrel” beer as the real thing.

“Who’s to say what’s real and what isn’t.” said a Watney’s spokesman the other day. “People like our beer, and therefore it’s real to us. We make some of the stuff Camra likes, but we make more of the stuff most people like.”

 

I admire Watney’s cojones, but the posture did not help its fortunes in the U.K., it might have been better to cozy up faster to CAMRA. If you can’t beat them join them, as the adage goes.

The article ends, in retrospect, on an interesting note. The St. Albans publican tells the Times that customers like the real ales he serves, the CAMRA-approved stuff, but sometimes people complain the beer has no head. He offered them a glib answer: you are here to drink the beer, not look at it.

But even real ale should have a head, this wasn’t just ignorant sputtering by those schooled on frothy keg beer or bottled beer (always quite fizzy). Either way, and while cask beer did enjoy a renaissance for many years, we see the underbelly of cask, even in its first flush of rebirth. The belly has swelled in recent years, with annual sales of cask ale falling steadily.

Say what you will about craft beer, but most of it comes equipped with a big creamy head. And craft beer is taking up the market share cask ale is losing, not industrial lager whose sales are also dropping. True, craft beer can be dispensed as real ale, but the classic, lodestar Yankee IPA comes cold and capped with a shaving cream-like head.

The customers who didn’t like the flattish real ales characteristic of the prosperous and trend-setting south and centre were heralds of the current real ale doldrums, a trend possibly now irreversible.

Ale will be saved, but the rescue may come finally courtesy American-style craft beer, not the kind of beer CAMRA has worked doggedly to save for almost 50 years.

Note re quotation:The quotation above is from the news story described and linked in the text. All intellectual property in the story belongs solely to the lawful owner, as applicable. Material is used for educational and historical purposes. All feedback welcomed.

 

 

Watney’s Red Barrel: Star in America

When we was fab

In a post two years ago, on the English pub at the 1964 New York World’s Fair, I noted that Watney’s Red Barrel Beer was on the menu. It was perhaps the first appearance in the U.S., unless small amounts were imported earlier. For the beer to be showcased by the U.K. at its pavilion at a prestigious international exposition was an imprimatur par excellence.

The brand originated in England in 1931, as numerous beer histories attest. Watney Combe Reid had conducted research to devise a beer whose stability would permit reliable export to India. Stability for this purpose meant heat-pasteurized, filtered, and force-carbonated.

In essence, it was a modern bottled ale in a large sealed can, later known as a “keg”. This beer was quite different from traditional, draught “real ale” which was live, unfiltered, and unpasteurized.

The 1930s seem late for a focus on the India market, and we don’t know if Red Barrel ever irrigated the last days of the Raj. It did appear in Australia in the 1950s, as a Christmas advertisement shows in Sydney’s The Sun in 1952.

From 1964 (at least) in the United States, Red Barrel was on the market for approximately 30 years in bottle and draft. This 1966 ad in East Hampton, NY proudly advertises draft Red Barrel and gilds it as England’s oldest draught beer.

Red Barrel was always regarded here as prime quality beer. One index is its price. According to this 1984 article in the Washington Post vaunting the virtues of imported beers Red Barrel was priced the same as Fuller’s London Pride and Charles Wells Bombardier Ale, both still going strong of course. Only Samuel Smith Brown Ale and Orval Trappist Ale, both new-generation imports with a craft-like cachet, fetched more money.

In 1980, an ad in Ithaca, NY had Red Barrel at $5.99/6 pack, a dollar more than (imported) Bass Pale Ale. In 1988 a case of Red Barrel, among a group of nine beers offered including imports such as Molson and St. Pauli Girl, was $16.49 a case in the summer season, the most expensive of all beers listed.

American beer needless to say was much cheaper.

The Post in the 1984 article was complimentary but perhaps nuanced, calling Red Barrel “smoother” than London Pride and, oddly enough, somewhat “American” in character. This was probably due to its malt adjunct or sugar component, which lessens malt sweetness and body.

James Robertson in his The Connoisseur’s Guide to Beer (1978, 1982) noted a “sour” element in Red Barrel – the same adjunct at work, likely. Robertson regularly used the term sour to describe inexpensive American brews. While nonplussed by the bottle, which scored relatively low in his taste score tallies for imported beers, he considered the draft “a much better product”.

For his part, Michael Weiner in his 1978 The Taster’s Guide to Beer gave the bottled beer “six mugs”, or “almost perfect” in his scheme. Only seven mugs (“the world’s best”) ranked higher. Most beers he rated fell in one of the first five ranks.*

John Porter, in the 1975 book All About Beer, included Red Barrel among his four picks for best imported English brews. The others were Watney’s Stingo Ale, Mackeson Stout, and Whitbread Ale.

As a reasonable sampling of contemporary U.S. critical opinion, the beer was obviously in general well-regarded.

As to general consumer reaction, Red Barrel was certainly a star performer. In 1971, a non-blind beer tasting conducted by New York Magazine placed it third out of 57 brews. First place went to a dark version of German Wurzburger, and fourth to Dutch Heineken. Second was an obscure French brand.

In 1982 Frederick Carpenter of Bethel, Connecticut, of Anglo-American ancestry and a dedicated Anglophile, threw a party to honour the traditions of St. George. What beer did he lay in? A keg of Watney’s Red Barrel. The story is interesting on numerous accounts, you can read it here.

Consumers were encouraged in this perception by commercial practices such as Red Barrel being flagship beer at the English-themed Lord Hardwicke pubs. This c.1970 venture was sponsored in part by a British lord. See my posting the other day on Hardwicke’s pubs..

By the early 1990s Sleeman Brewery in Ontario, an early craft brewer, acquired rights to Watney’s Red Barrel, presumably for export to the U.S. as it was never sold in Ontario. Perhaps a plan to sell it here had fallen through.

Commentary in recent years suggests the Sleeman version was a lager, which is plausible. I was given a bottle on a visit to Sleeman’s and recall it being bland. The English-made bottles and draft, brewed (at least) at Stag Brewery, Mortlake and later Usher’s, a Watney’s-Grand Met unit, were ale and superior in taste. But they weren’t real ale.

Anyway, by 1994 Watney’s was ending its presence on U.S. beer shelves.

Now, how strong was this once sought-after import? It was surprisingly hard to find out as bottle labels did not state it. Boak and Bailey’s recent article on U.K. Red Barrel history suggests the domestic brew was c.3.8% ABV, and somewhat higher for earlier bottlings.

To put this in context, 4% ABV was and is the norm for mass-market North American light beer.

Still, sedulous research has pulled up the number for imported Red Barrel in 1987: 3.92% ABV. It is from an analysis of beers and ales conducted by the Excise Tax Division of the Department of Revenue Services of Connecticut. I was rather shocked to see how low. It is 4% ABV for practical purposes, but still.

Tusker Malt Lager
Bia Ni Bora (Kenya)              5.24     …
Utica Club Pilsener Lager Beer
West End (USA)                   4.82     …
Watney’s Red Barrel Beer
Stag (England)                     3.92     …
Wurzburger Hofbrau Pilsner Beer
Wurtzburger Hofbrau          5.42     …

Whether this was the revised 1971 “Red” recipe or the earlier, c.90% malt recipe, I can’t say. I’d guess the former since, as stated above, the Post (1984) called it “smooth” in comparison to London Pride, oddly (or not) the very term used by Watney to describe the revised 1971 recipe (see Boak and Bailey again), and thenceforth to be known simply as Watney’s Red.

I’d think the new Red version was used for export too but the old name, Red Barrel, was still printed on bottles and tap clips.

Now, 4% ABV can produce fine beer – after all Pilsner Urquell, a legend in brewing, is 4.4%. Still, in terms of best English traditions, it seems a bit low. But there you have it.

My guess is the beer was probably somewhat like today’s Smithwick’s Irish Red, sweetish, with little hop aftertaste and a flattened note from adjunct. Or maybe like Rickard’s Red in Canada, a Molson-Coors product.

Rebrewings of Red Barrel in Britain seem to have produced satisfactory impressions but nothing over the moon.

Red Barrel was always what it was: an alleged but withal dubious improvement on traditional cask ale. It was designed by technologists who did not have the interests of beer purists in mind but rather, an overall goal to minimize product deterioration.

Red seems to have been less bitter than Red Barrel to appeal to an expanded franchise who could not abide a beer with hop character. Abetted by some ill-advised advertising choices after 1970, the beer finally caught up with its contradictions.

But it was a quality product in pre-craft America. There is no inconsistency here. Weiner, Porter, Robertson, the Post writer, the New Yorker magazine panel, etc. were not Pollyanna in their estimates. It is just that the standards of the day were quite different to today’s.

A fair-to-middling performer at best in Britain – or FTM among the cognoscenti – Red Barrel had star quality here due to the U.S. competition being so much lesser.

All that has been turned around due to the grit and doggedness of CAMRA and the North American craft trailblazers who took inspiration from its example.

Note re images and quotation: image above was sourced from this online vending site, item is c.1935 and offered by the vendor of heritage furniture and decor mentioned in the listing. The quotation is from an online discussion forum that reproduced the 1987 Connecticut government study, as mentioned and linked in the text. All intellectual property in the sources used belongs solely to the lawful owners, as applicable. Material is used for educational and historical purposes. All feedback welcomed.

……………………..

*For Jim Roberston’s fuller remarks on Watney’s Red Barrel, see my comment printed under Boak and Bailey’s recent article on Red Barrel history, linked below. In the comment as well I link to a colour film from the 1960s showing Red Barrel in action at the bar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lord of the Ales

I have had a long-standing series chronicling the fortunes and perceptions of the “English pub” and “Irish pub” outside Britain, and inside their home lands as seen by outsiders and sometimes local observers.

The periods cover pretty much every decade since the 1860s. One day I’ll collect them in a monograph. My last sortie was examining the English pub or tavern as a totem of sophistication and refined comfort in 1920s-1930s America. The meme was used to promote suburban homes (fitted with an English tavern man cave), business district restaurants, and local bars and dance halls.

I’ll return to this soon to profile a 1940 English tavern in Manhattan created by a successful German-American restaurateur, August Janssen, who saw which way the cultural winds were blowing. Janssen had run a famous German restaurant and bar in the city since the late 1800s, the Hofbrau Haus.

He had been through this tempest before in WW I without going over to the other side as it were, but by 1940 he must have decided the time was right to offer an Anglophilic option. More soon on the 1940 venture and its menu.

In a later period, I discussed the remarkably successful English pub at Montreal’s Expo ’67, and a couple of similar examples it encouraged in the city. One, the Sir Winston Churchill Pub, is still going strong as Winnies.

These Canadian versions of the English pub helped set the stage for many more such operations in Canada, including the thriving Firkin chain in Toronto.

In 1969, American entrepreneurs revived the same idea – as it wasn’t new, if I have shown nothing else. They had the brain wave to enlist an actual British lord in their venture, the 9th Earl of Hardwicke (1906-1974).

The Earl, Philip Grantham Yorke, was a distinguished figure in British society: Etonian, former cavalry and parachute officer, and high-echelon company director. In a way he was a predecessor of some current Royal or aristocratic figures, Sarah Ferguson comes to mind, who capitalized on the enduring American fascination with emblems of British culture.

The venture was described in a lightly mordant business article in 1969 in Long Island’s Newsday, see here.

The principal promoter, Charles Stein, easily raised the money to build a dozen units and the idea was to license more once the core operation was afloat. The venture did take off and as recently as three years ago two Lord Hardwicke’s Pubs were still operating, one in Barboursville, the other in Charlottesville, both in Virginia.

It appears they are now closed, and no pubs operate today under the Lord Hardwicke name in the U.S., but clearly some had a good run.

Newsday profiled the venture with pithy phrases such as “tanned, trim individual sporting a broad necktie [Stein]” and “plastic pub”. The pub was literally plastic in parts, to emulate a far-away vernacular for commercial practicality and efficiency.

The same thing is done today of course despite that fittings for some Irish pubs, in particular, are exported from Ireland as a lucrative business. In fact, according to Newsday, Stein had considered doing something similar for Lord Hardwicke’s Pubs but the cost was prohibitive, at the time.

More from the journalist, Clarence Newman:

[quoting Charles Stein] “Basically we plan to license less than half because it will be more profitable to run our own outlets. But with more than 400 openings planned, the license system gives us a healthy cash flow as well as allowing us to get a lot of units going fast and achieve a broad based operation.”

Although ads for Lord Hardwicke pubs lean heavily on the angle that they will be traditional (“The British pub. Authentically British. Every bit of it. The true pub.”), customers will not encounter oak beams, dart boards or even such English pub best sellers as gin and Scotch.

The menus for the pubs will list eight so-called “Heartye sandwiches” running from either a “tayste frankfurter” or “ye melted cheese” both costing 45 cents to “royal roast beef’ at 85 cents. To maintain the Anglo flavor there is also something called a “British submarine” which turns out to be an English hero sandwich (90 cents). Of course there will be fish and chips. Imported Watney Red Barrel and London Lager beers at 50 and 75 cents a mug, as well as Schlitz at 25 and 50 cents, will be on draught.

Although Stein … insists the interiors and exteriors of his pubs will be “very authentic” and styled by an English designer, they’ll all be as identical as Howard Johnson orange-roofed establishments. No stout English oak either. They’ll be made of molded Fiberglass components.

“Originally we wanted to bring the English pub over here,” recalls Stein as he relaxes behind a metal legged oval desk in his office in the modem General Motors Building. “But the idea was not practical. They will be English for the unsophisticated person who has never been to England.

“We’ve tried to simplify our operations so we can duplicate them by the hundreds,” says Stein. “We’re not building around people, rather we’re designing our restaurants so people are secondary, and the units can be operated by relatively unskilled persons who follow the rule book.”

 

It is easy to be a bit cynical reading such calculating efforts (which the Earl had no trouble signing on to, one might add). It would be more satisfying perhaps that Stein had a favourite local in London from his many business trips there and was inspired to set up a single, beamed bar with leaded casement windows. Ideal location? A manicured bedroom suburb, in Connecticut, say. The perfect retirement project.

But (usually) that’s not how business works, in Britain, America, Canada, China, or anywhere. The Lord Hardwicke’s venture was good business thinking, in 1969 and no less today. Don’t you think someone will create soon a chain of North American Railway Arch bars? It’s just a matter of time.

Some reading may think it weirdly apposite that Watney’s Red Barrel beer was to be sold in Lord Hardwicke’s pubs given its status as the bad boy of British beer, the one brew that more than anything stimulated the consumer beer lobby CAMRA and the real ale revolution.

Red Barrel was a fizzy, pasteurized “keg” beer, trumpeted by its maker as the latest and greatest but arousing, finally, hostility from partisans of traditional, unpasteurized, hand-drawn ales.

It just goes to show how wrong perceptions can be, or rather, how limited. Watney’s Red Barrel was sold in America from the 1960s through the mid-1990s, both in bottle and frequently on draft, as a premium product and was always regarded as such here.

Like Lord Hardwicke himself, like the circa-1970 Beatles, Michael Caine, Sean Connery, Diana Rigg, and today’s equivalents, British products reaching our shores have always connoted prestige, a strange mix of charisma, sophistication, and class.

The exported Red Barrel beer may have been, after 1971, the rebranded “Watney’s Red”, a revised, inferior recipe. Alternatively, it may have remained, for export purposes, the original, relatively high quality brew. Whatever it was, for an American curious to taste authentic ale from the place that invented the stuff, Watney’s Red Barrel was nectar. In a pre-wired time, little did he know or care what British beer obsessives thought about it.

The English beer writers Boak and Bailey have just penned the latest on Red Barrel’s history and fortunes in the U.K. It is good reading, and see our comment which adds a 1960s colour video showing the Red Barrel in action on the bar – to the evident satisfaction of the chaps present, it appears.

N.B. See my addendum in the Comments below.

Note re image and quotation: the image above is from a CBS19 (Charlottesville) news story on the closure of Lord Hardwicke’s Pub. The quotation is from the 1969 Newsday article linked in the text (via Fulton Historical Newspapers). All intellectual property therein are the sole property of the lawful owners, as applicable. Image and quotation used for educational and historical purposes. All feedback welcomed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Living Food History

What is food history? It can be almost anything, from cooking your mum’s meat loaf to following a recipe in a decades-, or even centuries-old, cook book. It can mean writing about food of the past, an activity that stretches from the halls of Academe (which has taken to the subject assiduously in recent years), to blogging on old menus as I sometimes do, to writing sophisticated, nuanced works such as by M.F.K. Fisher or Elizabeth David, or the food blogs and surviving food magazines.

But surely the most obvious form of food history is eating, literally, food of the past. That’s not really possible, you say. Food is perishable by definition. True, there is canned food, and famously people sometimes will sample from a tin found in a shipwreck or something of that order, but the chances to do that are minimal for most people.

In the world of drinks, the matter is quite different, as old wine, beer, and liquor can be consumed with little risk usually. People sometimes do this who have access, but I am talking here of food.

There is one area though where food history is living in the most palpable sense. The sources are not that hard to find, or haven’t been until recently anyway. A sub-culture in the United States sources and tastes military rations from different eras, some stretching back to the world wars and even earlier.

The leading practitioner is Florida-born Steven Thomas, and he has posted many videos on youtube describing his finds and the tastes of foods he tries. As cigarettes were packed in old rations sometimes and he smokes, he will offer opinions, say, on 1940s Chesterfields. I smoked decades ago and some of his descriptions remind me of 1970s unfiltered Camels, Philip Morris, or Old Gold.

Nor has Thomas’ work remained within the precincts (valuable as they are) of youtube. He was profiled in the pages of no less than the Financial Times magazine two years ago, read it here with descriptions of foods he tasted.

His observations on enduring national food preferences in the rations are interesting too. For example, it seems Italian soldiers sometimes get a shot of grappa with breakfast. British soldiers get their share of pudding and tea.

I find this area quite fascinating. By the way he has never gotten ill from eating an old ration (he did from eating a current one, he explains what happened in the story). He takes simple precautions – the visual and smell test, basically – but has remained hale even after eating Civil War hardtack, say, or tinned Boer War beef packed by Bovril.

Here is a sample video, for a U.S. Army field ration from 1943. This is not a novelty exercise, he expresses himself well and the comments are often of real interest.

He and his colleagues who do this – they have already held a convention, perhaps to become annual – are certainly food historians. They should be profiled in the North American food media as well as more specialized journals.

Food history must be thought of beyond the conventional. More broadly, the popular food world is not just latest trends such as bone broth, food halls, and vegan burgers.

Note re image: The image shown is a Greek field ration of c.2013. It was sourced from Wikipedia’s entry on field rations, here. All intellectual property in the image belongs to its sole owner. Image is used under terms of the stipulated Creative Commons open access (3.0) license, see text here. Image used for educational and historical purposes. All feedback welcomed.

Amsterdam 1870 AK Bitter – 2019 Version

I’m pleased to confirm that Toronto craft brewing pioneer Amsterdam Brewery will again brew, in collaboration with us, 1870 AK Bitter as a limited edition.

It is a medium-gravity pale ale and based on an 1870 English recipe I identified some years ago. This is the second brewing, I described the first last year in a series of posts.

This post summarized the effort and referenced other posts with technical details and my impressions of brewing day.

To keep things interesting we are changing it up this year: instead of Maris Otter floor malt we will use Chevallier, a historical variety I discussed in this post last year. My point there was, Chevallier is certainly a valid choice for any such project as it existed in 1870 and indeed was widely used.

At the same time, another English malt variety, even one developed much later such as Maris Otter, does not impact the essential historical validity. Of the numerous reasons for this, not least is the relatively high fermentation and hopping rates (for pale ale). The malt is relatively restrained in the palate, in other words, and hops have the biggest say…

Still, one cannot go wrong with Chevallier, and had we used it last year, likely this year we would use Maris Otter, if only to detect any contrast. As it turned out, for the second brewing it will be the other way around.

For hops, we are using only one variety, English leaf Golding, vs. two last year. They will go in mostly at the outset of the boil, which some Burton practice approved, with some in the whirlpool stage too.

Hops were added at different times during the boil in the past, as today. There was no iron rule but adding much of the load at the front end hopefully will impart maximum bitterness particularly as we intend to boil for two hours, as against one last year.

Bitterness was a prime object of the old beers, the idea being to maximize preservative character. Without today’s pasteurization and/or extensive refrigeration, unless consumed quickly beer would sour, not a desirable outcome for pale ale historically. The hop resins imparted by a long boil tended to enhance preservation – hence after all the name “bitter”.

The beer will be chilled and kegged for draft with some dry-hopped for cask (real ale) service. And some will be canned, as last year. We are using, as well, an English yeast this year, vs. American ale yeast last time.

In other respects we will follow the 1870 recipe again including for the hop charge, so three-four lbs/bbl by our estimate. Gravities will be about the same as last year. The higher gravity I.P.A. version also discussed by Aroma is a possibility for next year.

It’s exciting to be able to work again with Iain McOustra, Cody Noland, and the other brewers at Amsterdam. They are pros all the way and no matter how much one has read, written, and tasted, the pros who do it every day understand brewing like no other.

I’ve learned more than I could possibly have hoped to impart, but appreciate Amsterdam’s positive reaction to the first brewing, to the point of doing a Mark II. Amsterdam’s commitment to brewing heritage deserves the admiration and support of all who care about the art of brewing, its lengthy and honourable history, and no less shining future.

The pseudonymous brewer “Aroma”, who wrote the 1870 directions, is smiling from the empyrean vastness. Despite all the changes in materials, technologies, and whatnot he gets what we are doing. He is one with us and our contemporaries who love the beer palate – for whom it is, in sum, part of gastronomy.

 

 

Beer vs. Food

‍Beer is From Mars, Food is From Venus. Well, not Exactly, but…

One area of the food and beer debate rarely considered is their potential opposition. More typically, you will read of “what goes with what”, a spin-off from the same discussion in wine circles.

Yet, wine and food are boon companions in a way beer and food are not.

I approach beer primarily from a sensory standpoint. Not political. Not big business vs. small. Not old school vs. new. And not its place at the dinner-table, as eating changes the taste of beer in a way different from wine.

To maximise this way of liking beer, taste and nose are primordial, the object being to appreciate nuances of flavour and find exceptional examples. I taste for other reasons too (eg. historical, nostalgic), but am mainly interested in an optimal sensory experience.

Indeed beer by its heft, quantity, and calories is a type of food itself. Hence, normal food is, at best, optional with it in a way that does not apply to wines, dry wines at any rate.

I cannot properly appreciate – taste – a beer with strong food odours in the room, or when I eat anything with it except dry, bland crackers or bread, perhaps. To accompany a meal, beer is fine, but then the meal is the main object, it`s not tasting. 

The fine English beer pictured below preceded a Chinese meal. I`m sure they would go together well – it`s hard to see how things could go wrong – but to appreciate this fine example of the brewer`s art, I drank the beer first and ate after.

Traditional British places to drink beer did not stress food: U.K. beer writers since the 1970s have made much of the improvement in food quality in pubs. Yet, there was a logic to the old system.

The old pub did not simply facilitate people ingesting alcohol, but afforded them the opportunity to enjoy their preferred beverage on its full merits, without a passing plate of french fries or stew to compete with the beer. The banning of smoking in pubs had the side effect of enhancing this experience.

I will admit that probably most pub-goers don`t really care – after all a majority now drinks fizzy cold lager, some 65% as reported in James Beeson`s article from last May, here.

Had they been such connoisseurs, that shift would not have occurred and cask ales would still enjoy the 90% of the market they had before 1970. The shift from the old-established ales and, earlier, porter, occurred for reasons of fashion, business efficiency, and greater international travel.

Since drinkers did not tarry over the fine points of their brew, they were able to accept (British-made) lager in place of the old and stronger-tasting cask beers.

(In turn, the earlier palate of beer was likely largely the result of prevailing technologies as applied to available materials more than a specific epicurean choice. By largely, I mean for the majority of drinkers. Of course too fashion and trends played a certain role, eg., to expand the use of porter outside its cradle of London).

Today, craft beer in Britain is gaining on British lager, but even though it tastes quite different, the underlying reasons are similar to what spurred lager.

Those drinkers will drink craft beer with their meals, or on its own, just as they did the lager – the beer has a different function here, and tends to be fungible, to borrow from the economists.

But a minority of imbibers has always viewed what`s in the glass in a special way: a stand-alone datum of gastronomy capable of infinite perfection. They are epicureans.

Food is all very well, we enjoy it greatly, and its history, no less than beer, but the two are best kept separate except where beer is an ingredient in cooking. Our beer or two a day usually precedes dinner or lunch.  A meal always follows, but usually without amphibious help, maybe water, or diet soda.